Round 3 Discussion

[M4TT B8S]

At all concerned with his history in loses?

Sydney won't lose a whole lot this year... I'd be more concerned about how deep the Sydney midfield is, bit like Dogs, can't pick which ones will be a step above the rest

 

[Brad]

I'm doing Rocky to JJ this week. I have no cash otherwise I would've got Dusty. JJ will have scores of 70 over the year but all defenders will. He should still average 95, and to me that is worth paying 420k and using a trade on. And banking 130k.

Could be the best pick up for the year I will prob grab him next week would just like to see him play a team of the harks standards and see what he does before I pull the trigger like they said on the pod cast don't want a repeat of b smith last year or I'll be kicking my self again

 

[Steve]

Could be the best pick up for the year I will prob grab him next week would just like to see him play a team of the harks standards and see what he does before I pull the trigger like they said on the pod cast don't want a repeat of b smith last year or I'll be kicking my self again

Smith was unlucky because of the concussion in round 3. You can't predict that happening. If JJ gets concussed today and spuds it for the next 10 weeks, I'll eat my hat.

 

[Brad]

Smith was unlucky because of the concussion in round 3. You can't predict that happening. If JJ gets concussed today and spuds it for the next 10 weeks, I'll eat my hat.

Hahahaha fair call but smith is fine now and I'm not seeing the scores I had from him can't blame concussion now

 

[captainchardonnay]

After that goal he sat around 108 for the entire "no touch" period and one could argue having no impact through that 20 mins could of effected him going big.

I think the issue is that the scoring is supposed to identify the players that had the most influence on the game. In this case, it hasn't and it's not the first time. Floggard out scored him FFS

 

[bat]

Just a reminder on JJ:

Defenders 2016

 

[M4TT B8S]

Papley... oops... Oh well, still a successful trade at the moment because Gesham isn't playing and even if Papley scores 20 he'll go up 75k

 

[Steve]

Papley and Menadue on field this week. My premos better fire.

 

[doddy2731]

Was concerned with Menadue on field but may have worked out.

 

[Dino]

at least Barlow is doing something this week, but with Sandi going down, Nic Nat should be able to dominate and their mids take full advantage of his dominance.

 

[doddy2731]

Although Gaz finished the game like a Boss, he looked sore. Be interesting to see if he may get a rest against the Lions.

 

[Steve]

Although Gaz finished the game like a Boss, he looked sore. Be interesting to see if he may get a rest against the Lions.

I think I heard in the commentary that he didn't start the game with his shoulder strapped, but he copped a bump in the first and got it strapped straight away. Killed it either way but it was only Carlton. Would rather he missed a week than played sore and did more damage.

 

[Steve]

Only had room on the field for one of Adams or Weitering. After last week I went with Adams. Hopefully it doesn't cost me too much.

 

[tabs]

Sammy Gray's DE% atrocious again, but in his defence there were plenty that were lace out and his team"mates" just fumble and coughed possession.

This a bit of a worry though...

IF the player receives it lace out and fumbles its still counted as good. A 50/50 contest is good. Your DE% only goes down when you kick itto your opponent

 

[captainchardonnay]

IF the player receives it lace out and fumbles its still counted as good. A 50/50 contest is good. Your DE% only goes down when you kick itto your opponent

Unless your surname is Ablett. Then every touch is good.

 

[Tevez17]

IF the player receives it lace out and fumbles its still counted as good. A 50/50 contest is good. Your DE% only goes down when you kick itto your opponent

Dont think that's the case for -40m kicks, CD have done some tweaking.

 

[k-red17]

Quick question boys - Have Rich whose obviously out and Hartley as EMG along with Ruggles. Should I take Hartleys 53 or take a risk chuck Ruggles on field?

 

[Tevez17]

Quick question boys - Have Rich whose obviously out and Hartley as EMG along with Ruggles. Should I take Hartleys 53 or take a risk chuck Ruggles on field?

Role the dice on Ruggles I think.

 

[doddy2731]

Quick question boys - Have Rich whose obviously out and Hartley as EMG along with Ruggles. Should I take Hartleys 53 or take a risk chuck Ruggles on field?

Toughy, but i think Ruggles is worth the risk.

 

[alrighty then]

Quick question boys - Have Rich whose obviously out and Hartley as EMG along with Ruggles. Should I take Hartleys 53 or take a risk chuck Ruggles on field?

If ruggles stinkkssss it up and gets 30 then you only hypothetically lose 23 for not playing Hartley. But if Ruggles surprises and scores 100, you gain close to 50. I'd start Ruggles