Who are your other defenders? If you havent got one if Yeo, Laird, Sicily, Lloyd or Simpson (selection pending) I'd be making an effort to get them and it would be worth using 2 trades if it's your final upgrade.ok guys, getting tight now, last backline upgrade to, caqn scrap together 439 now, it nuff to bring in webster, but is he worth the risk< or do i downgrade 1 this week and down/upgrade next week to a true poremium, got 6 trades left so can still do it and have 3 trades left for he run home, as long as nothing else goes wrong. thoughts
I am looking at setting up a DPP swing with TMac from fwd line. Rice down to NMurphy (COLL) netts $121K. Have Guelfi at F7 and Ahern M9 & Giro M10.I have Ed Richards at D6 still. The plan was for Rice at D7 to make enough money to upgrade him to Webster, leaving Richards at D7 as reliable bench cover (Mihocek is my other defender). Rice being in and out of the team has stunted his cash generation which is leaving me short on field every week.
I only have 3 trades left so I only want to use 1 to upgrade this spot. I have 140k, so I can get Richards to anyone except for Lloyd or Crisp. Tom McDonald is tempting, Brayshaw as well. Or I can hope Rice plays this week any makes enough to switch him to Webster next week.
Thought? Should I just ditch Richards and hope Rice and Mihocek are reliable enough coverage? Or stick it out and hope for Webster next week.
Tough decision there @Trussles and not sure you can go wrong with either. Makes sense to look at the ownership numbers and i think Lloyd has a slightly better SC game at present and i would be going that way.Yeo or Lloyd? I don't have either. Main goal is to win my leagues and notice that Yeo (40.1%) is in a lot more teams than Lloyd (25.7%). Leaning towards Lloyd.
Got all them, was thinking of crisp or tmac to finish off, but webster is affordable with only hte one downgrade so not sure what to do. thxWho are your other defenders? If you havent got one if Yeo, Laird, Sicily, Lloyd or Simpson (selection pending) I'd be making an effort to get them and it would be worth using 2 trades if it's your final upgrade.
either or, lloyd is killing it this yeo and yeo is playing plenty of midlfield, either one will see you throughTough decision there @Trussles and not sure you can go wrong with either. Makes sense to look at the ownership numbers and i think Lloyd has a slightly better SC game at present and i would be going that way.
Post all you like mate! I brought in Beams last week so super happy so far. Feels like Martin could explode any moment but been saying that all year, maybe it just won’t happenhey guys sorry for posting again quick question: Martin vs Beams vs M Crouch?
hey guys sorry for posting again quick question: Martin vs Beams vs M Crouch?
Yeo or Lloyd? I don't have either. Main goal is to win my leagues and notice that Yeo (40.1%) is in a lot more teams than Lloyd (25.7%). Leaning towards Lloyd.
How many trades have you got left?Hey guys, need some advice from you good people.
Got the cash to go Boak-Westhoff. Then again, could go Rice-Lynch to give me the cash for Spargo-Mundy next week leaving Boak as M9/F7.
First option gets rid of my weakest 'premium' for the best available, whereas second option provides coverage / loophole ability.
Thoughts? Need to win over the next few weeks to cement finals spots in main leagues.
I have Ed Richards at D6 still. The plan was for Rice at D7 to make enough money to upgrade him to Webster, leaving Richards at D7 as reliable bench cover (Mihocek is my other defender). Rice being in and out of the team has stunted his cash generation which is leaving me short on field every week.
I only have 3 trades left so I only want to use 1 to upgrade this spot. I have 140k, so I can get Richards to anyone except for Lloyd or Crisp. Tom McDonald is tempting, Brayshaw as well. Or I can hope Rice plays this week any makes enough to switch him to Webster next week.
Thought? Should I just ditch Richards and hope Rice and Mihocek are reliable enough coverage? Or stick it out and hope for Webster next week.