Yeah stuffs up my trade plans. The one guy I didn't need to get injured.Fuuurc.
Holy strewth Rupeman!Gold Coast have a crazy injury list:
14 definitely out and 3 tested.
Thinking danger to Oliver and nank to Ryder, will change another 7 times before lockout but I mean atleast I can still trade out rocky or greenwood next week and have decent cover on all linesTo add some further pain to your (and my) predicament, Witts is out this week and possibly next week with a shoulder injury
Am I crazy to think of bringing in Sloane this week for danger over bringing in Oliver for danger?
Thinking danger will definitely go from my side but depends on teams this weekYes.
Don't think that ' s the correct move, that said if you can get Danger back in the following week without hurting your sides structure maybe.
Also not sure if Sloane is the one you should target.
Thinking danger will definitely go from my side but depends on teams this week
Not so sure about that, he may try save himself for finals since he isn't playing for a Brownlow anymoreI think he will go nuts when he comes back in.
If you can cover him for the week i still think you need to keep him, or immediately bring him back in.
Good luck which ever way you decided to go.
The decision not to challenge showed it's not about the Brownlow.Not so sure about that, he may try save himself for finals since he isn't playing for a Brownlow anymore
I would get Dusty over Kelly or Ross. Another to consider would be Matt Crouch.I don't have Dusty should I bring him in for Rocky or look to someone to beat him over the finals?
Kelly & Ross the 2 options I'm looking at closest at this point.
I would get Dusty over Kelly or Ross. Another to consider would be Matt Crouch.
Right on!it would encourage a season-long involvement because even if my team wasn't doing too well I wouldn't want to let the others in my league down. Having a prize for the best league after rnd.1 didn't encourage any long-term involvement.