Search results

Edit: moved to appropriate thread.

I have Jacobs but with so many other pressing concerns, you just have to hold these underperforming premiums. At least until after you've finished upgraded and you're confident you have trades to spare that wont be needed on injuries.

Annoyed with this weeks tradings. Narrowed my defensive choice to Docherty and Savage, and went for the cheaper option which looks to have cost me big points. Chose to trade out Barlow over Wells who now looks straight back in whereas no idea about when Wells will be back.

Awesome, well done! Can't say I'm too unhappy with Parker's 120, but it's no ~200

Should have listened to this :eek: Wow what a score, Shaw! Did anyone put the C on him?

Blakely did well but gee if there was a game and circumstance to need another inside mid that game was it.

Barlow had 193DT score. Still don't think that's enough for Ross to bring him back. :D Wingard finally with a ton this year. He's dirt cheap, people interested?

On a Standard Dev scale where 10 is Peak Priddis he'd be a 1. Enjoy the rollercoaster!

They're showing Barlow in a Peel jersey on tv right now on 7Mate so pretty sure he's playing there. :P

Ruggles late in and Barlow is playing in WAFL in an hour's time.

Cheers! Its the right move.

Fair enough. They're both so risky to keep. Comes down to personal preference really.

The thing with Sydney is they are hard to predict who will get the share of the pie each week. Especially if guys like Rampe, Tippett and Franklin go big then their stacked midfield can only score so much. This year it looks like Hanners and Parker are the ones to get. Stick a fork in McVeigh...

Parker's 120. Take/Leave or stick with Danger?

Trade one of your def rookies to Brand and trade another to a prem?

Are the people who are trading (or planning) to trade out Barlow, keeping Wells? If so, why? If both need to be traded out in coming weeks than its six of one, half a dozen of the other, but is there something about Wells with his achilles + resting that suggests he's going to be coming back sooner?

If your team is perfect, why wouldn't you be focusing on using your trades to cull or upgrade rookies? That's what I would be doing.

I need to trade one of Wells and Barlow (and Adams, but one bushfire at a time). Is the conservative play here to get rid of Wells before Barlow? I really dont want to do 2 sideways trade in 1 week (other being Houli out), at least getting rid of Wells wont feel like that but it may be biasing...

VC on either Danger or Pendles not going to put it on Parker or Selwood. That means C on...? Left with GAJ, Shaw, Gawn or Dusty. I don't having that question.

Thanks, I guess that is the big concern with him. Seems to plenty of options in defence but not a lot that stand out at that price range.