I am thinking of taking a stock market approach to this week.
This may be a controversial but I believe that the first two rounds is about trading aggressively. With prices frozen the next two weeks, I intend on bringing in players who will raise in price, and removing players whose price will surely drop – regardless of their stature in the game. Brodie Grundy will be traded out and back in again later when his price bottoms out. Do you cop a $100k+ loss in team value or would you prefer the ability upgrade a Walsh to a Sheed, or a libba to a Rockliff ( just examples but both players prices are now set to rise regardless of Round 2 output).
This is the one time of year you can avoid future price drops in advance - To not trade your biggest potential price dropper in round 1 could be awkard next week if other players get injured/fail to fire. We have 30 trades for the year, none will be more valuable than the first 4 trades in round 1 & 2 before prices change.
Thoughts?
David (2222 points this week)
This may be a controversial but I believe that the first two rounds is about trading aggressively. With prices frozen the next two weeks, I intend on bringing in players who will raise in price, and removing players whose price will surely drop – regardless of their stature in the game. Brodie Grundy will be traded out and back in again later when his price bottoms out. Do you cop a $100k+ loss in team value or would you prefer the ability upgrade a Walsh to a Sheed, or a libba to a Rockliff ( just examples but both players prices are now set to rise regardless of Round 2 output).
This is the one time of year you can avoid future price drops in advance - To not trade your biggest potential price dropper in round 1 could be awkard next week if other players get injured/fail to fire. We have 30 trades for the year, none will be more valuable than the first 4 trades in round 1 & 2 before prices change.
Thoughts?
David (2222 points this week)