There are some big scores tonight from Collingwood
Those that picked Grundy would be feeling pretty good.
Those that picked Grundy would be feeling pretty good.
There are some big scores tonight from Collingwood
Those that picked Grundy would be feeling pretty good.
I feel like I'm going to want WHE next week. Which makes me wonder if I should move on a Hannan/Houston/Marchbank this week...Indeed, the Nank vs Grundy battle was great to watch tonight!
Really regretting not picking WHE over Taranto. Hope Taranto can score higher this week to make us feel a bit better about it.
At least he's an easy swap if Taranto spuds it up again this week. Im in the same botReally regretting not picking WHE over Taranto. Hope Taranto can score higher this week to make us feel a bit better about it.
Starting with WHE was probably my biggest win so far. His role is very SC friendly as that link up player running up and down the wing, he's surprised me he can take a contested grab too! I don't want to get too far ahead of myself but he could end up being a keeper, if not one of the final upgrades
yes this cooled my rage as wellHow the hell does 35 touches and 2 goals equal 83!!!!!!! Treloar's first two rounds have been unbelievable
Edit: Changed to 108 now, phew
How the hell does 35 touches and 2 goals equal 83!!!!!!! Treloar's first two rounds have been unbelievable
Edit: Changed to 108 now, phew
It's purely clangers and poor disposal. He does have a tendency to butcher the ball at times. The whole Pies team were guilty of that. Amazed with WHE's score given how many times he kicked it directly to the opposition under no pressure. Maybe CD need to start doing unforced clangers and forced clangers?6 clangers & I'm assuming very low kicking efficiency that being said he should be rewarded for find the ball the way he does, seems a bit unfair that him getting the ball in traffic, under pressure but not contested is the same as say a flanker getting the ball 50M on his own.
It's purely clangers and poor disposal. He does have a tendency to butcher the ball at times. The whole Pies team were guilty of that. Amazed with WHE's score given how many times he kicked it directly to the opposition under no pressure. Maybe CD need to start doing unforced clangers and forced clangers?
125 is the minimum I would take from vice captain loop, so personally I would roll the dice and stick with Danger. Keep in mind the last time the Cats and North played, Danger had 48 disposals and 229 sc points. Could of course backfire, but for mine you have more to lose by not going with Danger.Should I loop Pendles or stick with old faithful Danger?
Some years I've when there haven't been many reliable superprimium players around I've used 120 as a benchmark. This year I really want 130 ... but I probably would lock in 125. Danger looks good enough and North bad enough that yeah I think I'd be putting the c on DangrrHi fellas, bit of a newbie here looking for advice. Should I loop Pendles or stick with old faithful Danger? Have Strndica.
I actually left Treloar out of my starting team because he is such a butcher. He's getting so much of the damn thing I think it is still going to hurt me.Fantasy freak tweeted something about Pendles and Treloar kicking efficiency. Pendle 85 ish% and Treloar 53%, wonder no more why his score isn't 120+.