Search results

Exact same situation for me, shocking week to have a Wednesday game. Actually the opposite, don’t think he’ll break back in for a while. I stupidly brought him in for Balta after Rd 1, wasted trade but just have to suck it up and keep moving forward

Hope some of you were smarter than me and jumped on Ross last week! I’m looking at bringing in two Bulldogs - Butters and Shultz to Hayes and Daniel

I like the Daniel pick. He’s a very creative user and always makes the right decision, half back is a good spot for him. Not that I think his role was in danger anyway but Duryea and Suckling are now out with mid to long term injuries so I can’t see Daniel being moved. Don’t think he’ll get a...

Heaps of options across 3 lines assuming you have dpp in your fwd’s and Duursma in def. Depends if you want a top shelf premium or are looking for value. I think you’d fall just short of Lloyd? Unless you were looking at downgrading somewhere as well. Rocky and Caleb Daniel still seem good value...

What @Haychh said. Otherwise your team looks to be in great shape.

Not a fan of that I’m sorry. Cogs is highly likely to average more than Boak from here. I understand you wanting to restructure but surely you can find a way that doesn’t involve sacrificing a healthy, well scoring premium? Drew has only had 1 bad game out of 3, I think he’s capable of 60+ most...

If you think he bounces back then back him in. Lloyd looks a shoe in for top 6 defender (probably top 2) but you can always get him later. FWIW I don’t have Lloyd yet either and I’m not grabbing this week

Ahh I missed that. In that case I don’t mind Hore to Butters. Drew comes forward and Moore goes back. If you have the cash after that you could even look at moving Devon Smith to Lloyd, depending on how you think Smith fares from here

Drew is the ‘must have’ rookie that you’re missing. Hore to Drew swinging Moore to defence would be my first move.

As much as the ‘no trades after round 1’ rule is often the right move, I think this is one case where I’d be willing to break it

I’m not really a fan of hedging bets in SuperCoach. If you want to run with Mummy, I think the only viable way to do it is to hope that one of Clarke/Fort/Smith are named and wear their scores for two weeks. With seemingly such a large gap between Grundy/Gawn and the next best ruck, I don’t...

Parker looks like he’ll at least get games. Cross Cavarra off for now, didn’t see him in the JLT and has since picked up a quad injury. One for mid year. Petruccelle, Burgess, and Balta are the other names getting around (going to assume you have Setterfield and Drew already)

Heeney all day. And I don’t mind the Darling pick either, but still Heeney all day

Option 1 for me as well, Guns and Rookies

Generic doesn’t have to be a bad thing though. My strategy is to just pick the players I believe will score the most, regardless of whether they’re in 1% of teams or 80%

Don’t pick him just for the sake of picking a POD. If you see some value and think he can average 105+ then he might be worth a gamble, but given he’s only gone over 100 once before (101 in 2015) it seems unlikely

I get where you’re coming from with Walsh, I was fairly strong on not starting him most of the preseason but he swayed me with his JLT form. At his price I think we need a minimum 80 average to be worth it, but after seeing him in action it seems there’s a reasonable chance he gets that. So he...

I have him at F4, F3 feels a little skinny with the lack of reliable rookies. But absolutely understand the selection, forwards this year are a nightmare

Bucket Hats are in

No I don’t think it’ll get that high but even 65-70% could see him reach 100+