Search results

Luke McDonald is a late out.

481332

Cavalier Roundhead in. Luck to all and may no injuries ruin your season.

@Dunny29 I wasn't going to start with Gawn for much the same reasons: unlikely to average the same so over-priced; one poor score (<100) and his price will drop dramatically. But over the last few days I've changed my mind and Gawn is back in my starting line-up. Why? His pre-bye fixture is...

As far as I know the total value of all players remains constant through the season. So, as you suggest, the more rookies that start and increase in price the more likely it is that premiums reduce in price. This is evident in their prices as the season progresses. E.G. Grundy: 2018 - averaged...

I understand the problem! atm I'm by-passing it altogether by starting neither Gawn nor Grundy. Which, of course, simply delays the issue to sometime mid-season.

A stat you might find interesting. When last year's SC scoring is compared to the previous 5 years: no of players averaging 102 or more - up by 56% no of players averaging 48 or less - up by 17% I'm afraid I don't have the breakdown by position.

@Dunny29 I agree with you on the over-priced bit. atm I haven't got any of Lloyd, Neale, Gawn, Grundy or Danger in my starting line-up. Although there are other considerations as well: injury for Neale and Danger, Cameron for Grundy As for cash generation: the non-Vic ones should be good to go...

Top left hand cnr of team page: field, list, history. Click on history. Top right hand cnr of history page: season 2021 with drop down options to previous seasons.

Team: Cavalier Roundhead Rankings: 2020 : 4,780 2019: 16,989 2018: 8,419 2017: 1,300 2016: 49,719 (lots of injuries) Leagues: can't remember

I'd go Option 2 for a few reasons. I can't see Gawn repeating his average from last year so he is probably over-priced. On the other hand, Grundy didn't like hub-life and is maybe under-priced. Remember, in 2019 it was Grundy who shaded Gawn on averages: 130.0 to 128.4. Stewart looks to be a...

atm I'm starting with all three. As you say, there's so much value. Plus, I think we might be light on for first year rookies in the early rounds. None of the 42-odd Victorian draftees played any serious footy last year. They are bound to be under-done compared to your usual first year players.

I'm not really sure. Maybe the Lions mixed the on-ball roles up a bit? Used Lyons as a blocker rather than ball getter? He attended his usual quota of centre bounces. Given he has a 173BE he'll drop in price - could you wait a week?

Yeah, no absolute need unless you've got less than the requisite 18. Me, I've got a bare 18 playing this week depending on team selections. I would prefer not to trade but I might have to. We'll see.

A great big well done! To get into the top 1,000 over these last few rounds while living in the States is impressive. I hope you cam keep it up.

I've got both Draper and McInerney/Comben. Draper missing games is a worry. It didn't matter last week with the "best 18" scoring. It might matter this week as we won;t know if Draper is playing until after the Lions-Roos game. At least with McInerney you know he will play - and as the #1 ruck.

And ain't that grand? I knew I kept him for a reason!!

Yeah, Gawn doesn't normally score well against Brisbane but with only a McInerney/Smith combo? With a 124BE you'd think Gawn will rise in price again.

I've got B Z-T and Brander and hoping both get games. I think Brander is the more likely as he looked like he had good JS before he was injured. afaik he's just had the one practice match since recovering so maybe it's just a matter of match fitness. B Z-T I'm less sure about. I thought with...

I assume you've listened to this week's podcast? If you haven't I suggest you do before deciding on Pittonet. They have an extended discussion on what to do with Pittonet. fwiw I don't have Pittonet but if I did I'd trade him - just not to Gawn. Maybe to English? As a stepping stone?