Search results

  1. Steve

    Round 9 Discussion & Trade Talk

    It was between him and Oliver. The price was the deciding factor.
  2. Steve

    Round 9 Discussion & Trade Talk

    Well Crouch was a great trade in last week. Why bring him back if hes not right!!
  3. Steve

    Round 9 Discussion & Trade Talk

    Rory Lobb at 380k? Bottomed out due to an injury affected 57 a week after an on-fire Grundy kept him to 56. Other than that, the lowest score since taking over first ruck duties in the finals last year is 97. 25k from Doedee to a possible 95avg top 8 fwd... worth a thought.
  4. Steve

    Round 8 Discussion & Trade Talk

    OK Ive decided theres too much value around this week and Billings has to go. I can either bring Crouch into the mids via DPP leaving Kelly at M8, or for 70k just straight swap Billings to a bottomed out Hogan or Darling. Bringing in a forward shores up the line and leaves me with 1 rookie on...
  5. Steve

    Round 7 Discussion

    He was on 23 about 10 mins in and I actually said "yes!!" out loud. Then he turned back into his usual self. Will hold until the byes and turn him into Gray I think.
  6. Steve

    Trades before round 7

    Or not! Well done to anyone who got on him this week. Ended up getting McLean in for Holman, happy with that.
  7. Steve

    Round 7 Discussion

    Selwood as VC. Tick. Guelfi as my only loophole option with the E on Langdon. Fail. Think I have to C Titch and bank on Fritsch scoring solidly.
  8. Steve

    Trades before round 7

    I'll be getting tricky with a whole lot of DPP swings and going Holman to McLean. Keeping Billings for now... I dont trust him at all but if he sits at F6 and is worth 380-400k at the byes, then with no other issues I'll upgrade him to the best remaining forward.
  9. Steve

    Trades before round 7

    I'm trading him to anyone else. Literally anyone. Cant handle him in my side any more! This ones way out there but what about Mitch Robinson? Scoring consistently, well priced, avoiding the tag that clearly goes to Zorko, and then Beams. DPP, reasonably priced, massive POD. He might be picking...
  10. Steve

    Round 6 Discussion

    I can't handle having Billings in my side. He's unbearable to watch.
  11. Steve

    Round 6 Discussion

    Giles Langdon was looking so good in the first half! Was on track for a ton, really could have used that score up forward this week.
  12. Steve

    Round 6 Discussion

    He scored 143. It's a no brainer. What's the best you could hope for from another captaincy option? 160? So you gain 17 points in a high risk move. And if that backfires and your C still has a solid game but scores 120, then you've lost 23. And you would deserve it IMO! Take 143 from a VC...
  13. Steve

    Round 6 Discussion

    Abso-freaking-lutely!
  14. Steve

    Trades Before Round 6

    No, hes at F6. That is my only option at a rookie downgrade this week. Already offloaded Bonner and Brayshaw and my team will stall if I dont move someone on soon. Bundys scoring looks like it's starting to dry up, so I might go early on him.
  15. Steve

    Trades Before Round 6

    Thinking Christensen to Guelfi. Nice little cash grab for the Danger trade.
  16. Steve

    Rnd.5 Discussion

    I would say Fritsch is being rested due to the short turnaround. I'd guess that he plays round 6. If you have Garlett on field for him this week then you're losing about 30 points (given Fritschs avg)... is it worth burning a trade just to cover that?
  17. Steve

    Rnd.5 Discussion

    Sicily AND Selwood!! My run of luck might be coming to an end...
  18. Steve

    Rnd.5 Discussion

    Flicked the C onto Fyfe 3 mins before the game started. Lucky move!
  19. Steve

    Trades before Round 5

    That was 2012, he did a knee and had a full reco.
  20. Steve

    Trades before Round 5

    I think I'm trading Goldy. He will be lucky to average 90. Giving up 20+ points a week on one player (Grundy to avg 110+) is a killer. I also have Hibberd and Billings, and as frustrating as they are, I dont think they will hurt as much given their higher ownership.